See veebileht kasutab küpsiseid kasutaja sessiooni andmete hoidmiseks. Veebilehe kasutamisega nõustute ETISe kasutustingimustega. Loe rohkem
Olen nõus
"Muu" projekt KNTS-59/8 ARH 2013/X
KNTS-59/8 ARH 2013/X ""Nordic Dimension in Architectural Education" raport (1.12.2012−28.02.2013)", Jüri Soolep, Eesti Kunstiakadeemia, Eesti Kunstiakadeemia, Arhitektuuriteaduskond.
S03-12/0437L
KNTS-59/8 ARH 2013/X
"Nordic Dimension in Architectural Education" raport
"Nordic Dimension in Architectural Education" report
"Nordic Dimension in Architectural Education" raport
1.12.2012
28.02.2013
Teadus- ja arendusprojekt
Muu
ETIS klassifikaatorAlamvaldkondCERCS klassifikaatorFrascati Manual’i klassifikaatorProtsent
4. Loodusteadused ja tehnika4.1. Arhitektuur ja tööstusdisainT240 Arhitektuur, sisekujundus2.1. Ehitusteadused (ehitusprojekteerimine, ehitustehnika, tööstus- ja tsiviilehitus ning teised seotud teadused)100,0
AsutusRollPeriood
Eesti Kunstiakadeemiakoordinaator01.12.2012−28.02.2013
Eesti Kunstiakadeemia, Arhitektuuriteaduskondkoordinaator01.12.2012−28.02.2013
AsutusRiikTüüp
Eesti Kultuurkapital
PerioodSumma
01.12.2012−28.02.20132 000,00 EUR
2 000,00 EUR
Arhitektuuri sihtkapital

The working group is a platform for creating a common Nordic.Baltic understandind of similarities and differences in national accreditation and quality assurance polices as well practices. The working group is among other things, supposed to explore the influence of the Qualification Directive n the curriculum and promote common regional characteristics. The working group saw its first main task to map the situation in all the countries of NAA and describe the diverse systems currently in place. The working group also find it important to analyse the different motivation of accreditation systems in Nordic-Baltic area.
The working group is a platform for creating a common Nordic.Baltic understandind of similarities and differences in national accreditation and quality assurance polices as well practices. The working group is among other things, supposed to explore the influence of the Qualification Directive n the curriculum and promote common regional characteristics. The working group saw its first main task to map the situation in all the countries of NAA and describe the diverse systems currently in place. The working group also find it important to analyse the different motivation of accreditation systems in Nordic-Baltic area.
KirjeldusProtsent
Katse- ja arendustöö100,0